Previously, we talked about the 5 Ws of IFRS 17. This blog post (Part 2) will discuss the H: How does IFRS 17 replace IFRS 4?
A Consistent Model
Figure 1: The components that make up IFRS 17 insurance contract liabilities.
IFRS 17 introduces the General Measurement Model (GMM) to calculate insurance contract liabilities for all insurance and reinsurance contracts. It is made up of three components:
- Present Value of Future Cash Flows (PVFCF)
- Expected future cash flow – The current estimates of cash inflows and cash outflows e.g., premiums, claims, expenses, acquisition costs, etc.
- Discount Rates – Current market discount rates, which are used to normalize the present value of expected future cash flows.
- Risk Adjustment (RA) – The compensation a company requires for bearing insurance risk. Insurance risk is a type of non-financial risk and may consist of the uncertainty of cash flows, the timing of cash flows, or both.
- Contractual Service Margin (CSM) – The equal and opposite amount to the net cash inflow of the two previous components. This ensures there is no day-one profit recognized in Profit or Loss (P&L) for all contracts.
More Transparent Information
Figure 2: How IFRS 17 recognizes profit in P&L.
IFRS 17 only allows insurers to recognize profit once insurance services are provided. This means that insurers can no longer recognize the premiums they receive as profit in P&L. Rather, at the end of each reporting period, insurers will report the portion of the CSM remaining as Insurance Revenue after they fulfil obligations such as paying claims for insured events.
Insurance Service Expenses reflect the costs incurred when fulfilling these obligations for a reporting period. This consists of incurred claims and expenses, acquisition costs, and any gains or losses from holding reinsurance contracts. The net amount of Insurance Revenue and Insurance Service Expenses make up the Insurance Service Result. This approach differentiates the two drivers of profit for the insurer: Insurance Revenue and Investment Income. Investment Income represents the return on underlying assets of investment-linked contracts, and Insurance Finance Expenses reflects the unwinding and changes in discount rates used to calculate PVFCF and CSM.
Figure 3: A comparison of IFRS 4 and IFRS 17.
Regarding presentation of financial statements, IFRS 17 requires more granularity in the balance sheet than IFRS 4 (Figure 3), specifically on the breakdown of insurance contract liabilities: PVFCF, RA, and CSM. This allows for improved analysis of the insurer’s products and their business performance.
On the statement of comprehensive income, IFRS 17 has removed Premiums and replaced Change in Insurance Contract Liabilities with the new components introduced in the balance sheet – PVFCF, RA and CSM. Now, the first items listed present the insurance components that make up Insurance Service Result. This is followed by Investment Income and Insurance Finance Expenses, which together determine the Net Financial Result. With a clear distinction of the different sources of profit, this framework allows for better comparability among industries.
In summary, IFRS 17 is the accounting Standard that introduces a consistent model for measuring liabilities for all insurance contracts. It also increases the transparency of the source of insurance-related earnings by separating insurance services from investment returns, which provides global comparability for the first time in the insurance industry.
Carmen Loh is a Risk Consultant with FRG. She graduated with her Actuarial Science degree in 2016 from Heriot-Watt University before joining FRG in the following fall. She is currently the subject matter expert on an IFRS 17 implementation project for a general insurance company in the APAC region.